Perhaps the architects and critics would react with indignation to the considered 'taxonomy'. At the same time, we offer only a description of the prevailing today in the market system of definitions that may be useful to traders, and consumers. As well as architects and designers – from the practical point of view. To reconcile this with the system adopted by the people of sophisticated definitions, let us call these groups' pseudo-styles. If you would like to know more about U.S. Mint, then click here. " And recall: correct called 'classics' – 'traditional style'.
A 'high tech' and other styles, to traditional non, called the 'modernist'. Sonia Gardner: the source for more info. The simplest system for lighting styles used by many providers, consists of only three points: 'classic', 'modern', 'high tech'. Leaving aside the danger of misunderstandings caused by an oversimplification, we will try to describe – what do they mean when mention each of these styles. 'Classic'. About her say 'Time-tested'. By the way, a landmark 'Art Nouveau' – now, academically defined as the style of late 19 th, early 20 th century – the same 'classic'. Like the 'classicism' 18-19-th century, which is also called 'Neo'. Such are the Paradoxes of definitions.
But we do not confuse! Done soundly, antique, traditional, and without 'new-fangled frills' – means a classic. From a design standpoint, we find in the classic style of symmetry, perfect proportions, traditional forms and materials. Functionally, the design can be considered redundant: the beauty above prostetskogo desire to use the object exactly as prescribed – and here the status of the owner should be emphasized, and his taste, and firmness belief that 'eternal classic.